
Owners bring RIG one workflow that keeps slipping. Mike Rodgers scopes it with your people, builds it, and writes the acceptance checks himself.
Mike Rodgers works directly with clients from a Denver base. He scopes the problem with operators and executives, builds the first production path, and stays close to the build and the handover until your team can run it.
Talk with Mike
The person who scopes the workflow stays close to the build and the handover.
Mike maps the workflow with the people who run it: what happens now, who touches it, where it slips.
A written scope: what is in, what is out, and which systems the work crosses.
What working means, written as checks and agreed before any build starts.
Source, configuration and operating notes go to a named owner on your team.

Illustrative sample, not a client result. Photos on this page are illustrative, not clients.
Talk with Mike →A career across manufacturing engineering, healthcare technology and operational adoption.
These roles describe Mike's background. They are not client work.
The right mechanism for the work, not one hammer for every job.
Yes. The person who scopes the workflow stays close to the build and the handover.
A diagnostic conversation, a written scope, acceptance checks agreed before the build, then a handoff to a named owner on your team.
Denver, Colorado. Mike works directly with clients from a Denver base.
The One-Workflow Review, and everything else on this site, is scoped and priced after a short conversation.
Bring the workflow that keeps slipping. A short brief is enough to start.
A formal partner requires a written agreement and references. We do not list any here. What is below is the working set our builds use today, separated into the running tier and the compatible tier.
| Tier | What it means | Listed today |
|---|---|---|
| Formal partner | A written partner or referral arrangement with a real firm, named with permission. On today: none. | None. Adding a partner is a Gate-D approval that names the firm and the scope. |
| Tech we use | A tool we hold an account for, run workloads on, or have shipped in a real RIG project. Listed without endorsement. | Vercel (hosting + serverless), Stripe (test mode only), GitHub (private repos), a managed Postgres instance, an internal LiteLLM-style gateway on a fleet host. |
| Compatible | A tool we are ready to build with on a client engagement, but have not shipped inside a RIG project. | Supabase, Neon, Convex, Airtable for data, Clerk, Kinde for auth, Twilio Segment for messaging front-ends. We choose at project start, not before. |
This page does not speak for any vendor listed. Names appear because they are the tools a buyer is likely to compare against, not because they have an arrangement with RIG.