RODGERS INTELLIGENCE GROUP · DENVER, COLORADOFree intake Test Kit →
Menu
Illustrative photograph of a desk with a laptop, a monitor and an open notebook
For Denver law firms with 5 to 50 attorneys

One-Workflow Reviewpriced after a short conversation

FIND WHERE NEW-MATTER INTAKE STALLS.

A written review of one workflow: who owns each step, where it stalls, and the next fix with a retest date.

Buyer-side research on law-firm intake reports 35% of business-hour calls missed, against case values from $3,000 to $15,000 (Gabbyville, 2026).

One workflow, up to three connected systems. Readout within ten business days after required access. Implementation quoted separately.

Book a free 30-minute readiness conversation
Who it is for

MATTER INTAKE IS A DOCUMENT PROBLEM.

Law firm owners and managing partners. The work is matter-led: an inquiry is a potential matter, and it needs a named owner, a reply window and a record a reviewer can open.

Discuss the intake workflow
What you get

WHERE THE WORK GETS FIXED.

CaptureEvery new-matter inquiry lands somewhere a named owner sees it, with the fields the firm actually needs.Discuss the intake workflow →
OwnershipOne named owner per inquiry and a review point where a lawyer decides. No shared inboxes deciding alone.Discuss the intake workflow →
RecoveryWhen delivery fails, the failure is visible and routed - not silent.Get the kit →
An illustrative photograph of an office at dusk with desk lamps on
How the work runs

ONE WORKFLOW, END TO END.

The firm's own matter-intake path, in the firm's own words.

01

Diagnostic conversation

We walk one inquiry from first contact to first reply and name where it slips.

02

Agreed build boundary

A written scope: what is in, what is out, which systems the work crosses.

03

Acceptance checks

What working means, written as checks and agreed before any build starts.

04

Handoff plan

Source, configuration and operating notes go to a named owner at the firm.

Discuss the intake workflow
Worked example

WHAT A MATTER-INTAKE RECORD CAN SHOW.

DEMONSTRATION, NOT A CLIENT RESULT

Sample matter-intake record, illustrative only

  • The situation: an inquiry arrives and no named owner receives it.
  • The expected behavior: the record reaches a named owner and the backup on failure.
  • The evidence to inspect: the record, the delivery event and the named reviewer.
  • The handover record: source or configuration, operating notes, agreed acceptance record.
Illustrative sample, not a client result.
An illustrative photograph of a printed worksheet booklet on a desk

Illustrative sample, not a client result. Photos on this page are illustrative, not clients.

Talk to Mike →
Where to start

THREE WAYS IN.

Questions

REAL QUESTIONS, PLAIN ANSWERS.

Is this legal advice?

No. RIG is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. No compliance certification is offered.

What about client confidentiality?

Client information that cannot go to public AI services has a path: one workflow inside the firm's own infrastructure boundary, with a written acceptance check before live data runs.

Do you work with our case management software?

The work is scoped around the tools your firm already uses. Where a system cannot support the workflow, that is named in the build boundary before anything starts.

What does it cost?

The One-Workflow Review, and everything else on this site, is scoped and priced after a short conversation.

Delivery confidence

WHAT IS DELIVERED. WHO DELIVERS IT. CHECKED HOW.

Named accountability and written checks, agreed before work starts. What you can inspect is named below.

What is deliveredA written review of one workflow: who owns each step, where it stalls, and the next fix with a retest date. Capture: every new-matter inquiry lands somewhere a named owner sees it, with the fields the firm actually needs. Ownership: one named owner per inquiry and a review point where a lawyer decides. Recovery: when delivery fails, the failure is visible and routed. Handoff plan: source, configuration and operating notes to a named owner at the firm.
Who delivers itMike Rodgers, Rodgers Intelligence Group, Denver.
By whenReadout within ten business days after required access. Implementation quoted separately.
Acceptance checksWhat working means, written as checks and agreed before any build starts.
If a check failsIf a written acceptance check fails, the failure is documented and reworked before handoff.
What you get to inspectThe “What a matter-intake record can show” block is a labeled demonstration: DEMONSTRATION, NOT A CLIENT RESULT, an illustrative sample, not a client result. Demonstrations on this page are illustrative, not client results. The free Client Intake Failure-Test Kit is available to run yourself.
PrerequisitesA diagnostic conversation walking one inquiry from first contact to first reply, then a written scope: what is in, what is out, which systems the work crosses.
Out of scopeRIG is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. No compliance certification is offered. Implementation is quoted separately.
Next step

DISCUSS THE INTAKE WORKFLOW.

Name the workflow: where a new-matter inquiry enters, who should own it, and where it stalls today.

What to send
  • Where a new-matter inquiry enters.
  • Who should own it.
  • Where it stalls today.
Photos on this page are illustrative, not clients.