
One-Workflow Reviewpriced after a short conversation
A written review of one workflow: who owns each step, where it stalls, and the next fix with a retest date.
Buyer-side research on law-firm intake reports 35% of business-hour calls missed, against case values from $3,000 to $15,000 (Gabbyville, 2026).
One workflow, up to three connected systems. Readout within ten business days after required access. Implementation quoted separately.
Book a free 30-minute readiness conversationLaw firm owners and managing partners. The work is matter-led: an inquiry is a potential matter, and it needs a named owner, a reply window and a record a reviewer can open.
Discuss the intake workflow
The firm's own matter-intake path, in the firm's own words.
We walk one inquiry from first contact to first reply and name where it slips.
A written scope: what is in, what is out, which systems the work crosses.
What working means, written as checks and agreed before any build starts.
Source, configuration and operating notes go to a named owner at the firm.

Illustrative sample, not a client result. Photos on this page are illustrative, not clients.
Talk to Mike →No. RIG is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. No compliance certification is offered.
Client information that cannot go to public AI services has a path: one workflow inside the firm's own infrastructure boundary, with a written acceptance check before live data runs.
The work is scoped around the tools your firm already uses. Where a system cannot support the workflow, that is named in the build boundary before anything starts.
The One-Workflow Review, and everything else on this site, is scoped and priced after a short conversation.
Named accountability and written checks, agreed before work starts. What you can inspect is named below.
Name the workflow: where a new-matter inquiry enters, who should own it, and where it stalls today.