RIG.
← Rodgers Intelligence Group

Capacity-Leak Report · Services & CPA Firms · $5M+

Where is your services business leaking capacity?

It's usually not a headcount problem — it's a capacity-leak problem. Find the manual work draining throughput and margin, and reclaim it without hiring.

5-min scan Modeled from public benchmarks No RIG client claims
Get my capacity-leak report →

the reframe

It's a capacity-leak problem, not a headcount problem.

Before you hire

Most firms that feel a capacity ceiling don't need more people — their senior, licensed, billable staff are doing work a system should do. Before you run a 10-week hiring search in a tight labor market, find out where the hours you already pay for are leaking. Reclaimed capacity is the team you already have, producing more.

the four places services firms leak capacity

Find the one costing you most.

Billing leakage

Billable time that never makes it onto an invoice — the hours quietly lost between work done and work billed.

Sub-70% utilization

The gap between a healthy ~75% and where your team actually runs. Every point below is paid capacity producing nothing billable.

Manual back-office

Reconciliation, prep, data entry, and rework pulling senior staff off the billable work clients pay for.

Bespoke, not productized

Rebuilding from scratch for every client instead of running a repeatable system that scales without new hires.

The report scores which one is costing you most, grounded in your own answers — not a generic "AI maturity" score.

the 5-minute scan

Where's your leak — and how big?

Four questions. If your firm is already running lean, the scan tells you so — you don't need us.

Question 01 · the primary leak
What share of your senior / licensed staff's time goes to work a system could do?
Question 02 · delivery
Is your delivery productized, or rebuilt bespoke for every client?
Question 03 · billing leakage
How much billable time never makes it onto an invoice?
Question 04 · utilization
Where's your team's utilization versus a healthy ~75%?
Your capacity-leak verdict
Get the full Capacity-Leak Report

I'll send your personalized report by email: which leak is costing you most, modeled/illustrative reclaimable-hours and margin ranges cited to public benchmarks, the margin-vs-growth fork for the hours you free, and three concrete first moves. Every figure is modeled or publicly cited — not a RIG client result.

what the benchmarks show

The gap is bigger than it feels.

~66%
Prof-services utilization vs ~75% for high performers (SPI Research, illustrative)
12–18%
Billing leakage recoverable within 90 days (modeled range)
15–20 hrs
Per professional per week freed (modeled/illustrative)

Every one of these is a public benchmark or a modeled range — cited, clearly labeled, and explicitly not a RIG client result. The report grounds them in your own answers instead of a generic industry average.

where does the freed time go?

Margin or growth — make it a choice.

Freed capacity is a decision, and most firms leak it back into more manual work by default. Drop the reclaimed hours to the bottom line and you buy margin. Reinvest them in delivery and pipeline and you buy growth. The report makes the fork explicit so the decision is deliberate — not something that quietly disappears back into the day-to-day.

reclaim capacity without new hires

RIG's governed approach.

The free Capacity-Leak Report is the top of a short ladder: report → a $2,500 refundable opportunity brief → a fractional CAIO engagement → a governed build. RIG names the leak, then builds governed automation that reclaims the hours safely — with a human in the loop and an audit trail, not a black box. The goal is more output from the team you have, not a headcount cut.

RIG runs its own operation on 100+ governed agents across 24 internal systems — our own build, shown as the mechanism, not a client testimonial. For category proof: one company doubled its BDR efficiency overnight by fixing data quality, not headcount (Owner.com, reported via SaaStr) — their result, not ours.

Get my capacity-leak report → See how governed automation works →

questions

Capacity, answered.

How can a services or CPA firm grow revenue without hiring?

Break the revenue-per-headcount link: raise utilization and automate manual back-office work so the team you already have produces more billable output, instead of adding payroll to add capacity.

Where do professional-services firms lose the most capacity?

Billing leakage, sub-70% utilization, and manual back-office or reconciliation work that pulls senior, billable staff off the work clients actually pay for.

How much capacity can automation realistically free?

Public and modeled ranges suggest roughly 12–18% billing recovery within 90 days and 15–20 hours per professional per week — figures are illustrative benchmarks, not RIG client results.

Can automation help with the accountant shortage?

Yes — instead of a multi-week hiring search in a tight labor market, reclaim capacity from existing staff by automating reconciliation, prep, and close tasks, so the team you have absorbs more work.

Every figure on this page is modeled/illustrative or cited to a public benchmark (e.g. SPI Research) — not a RIG client result.

RIG is pre-first-external-contract: no client names, logos, or testimonials appear here, by design. Owner.com's figures are that company's publicly reported results, cited to SaaStr — not RIG's. Reclaimable-hours and margin ranges are illustrative benchmarks, not a promise for your specific firm.